banner graphic
Airport Webcams
Who's Online
15 registered (Teg916, Delco, multisync, Desert Hawk, magman, Henry M., Float Pilot, Cam, Nintendo Pilot, Willie, Pilawt, Ward Holbrook, baboss, Rich Cunningham, Awkward Bird), 146 Guests and 36 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
singhap11, chrismills, R Bragg, bryant, Jkind
5962 Registered Users
Top Posters
Bargain Bob 84280
Cessna Dude 6628
Rusty Rudder 4857
vettdvr 4837
California Flyer 4647
Clyde Cessna 3203
wrecksum 2704
Willie 2350
XP Driver 2053
Ward Holbrook 2047
Nightowl 1826
ytodd 1822
Don Tedrow 1778
RodneyHooverCFI 1642
Lee T. Hargic 1628
November X-ray 1589
Nintendo Pilot 1582
Glenn Darr 1540
Bigdoggh 1412
oilwell1415 1411
Pilawt 1353
peedie montgomery 1205
EdW 1154
Jim_1 1128
Propduster 1047
Awkward Bird 987
Showboatsix 967
OldCrow 864
Renegade 9 861
Shuswap 788
Top Posters (30 Days)
Bargain Bob 3191
vettdvr 174
oilwell1415 110
Willie 88
Rusty Rudder 84
Singh 79
Luvrv8 69
Don Tedrow 56
Float Pilot 55
Joeman434 54
Shuswap 45
Jim_1 41
Ward Holbrook 40
Onebadjudge70 38
Wayne R 37
California Flyer 36
Birdman 35
magman 32
XP Driver 30
Nintendo Pilot 29
3.14 LET 26
Teg916 26
Henry M. 23
JDC_Oklahoma 22
Pilawt 21
Clyde Cessna 20
Pilot110 18
Awkward Bird 18
tvpilot 16
3hawks 16
Daily FAR - Test your knowledge!
Topic Options
#88185 - 08/07/12 05:48 PM 172N with 180HP conversion = FUN
Awkward Bird Online   content
Silver Pilot

Registered: 11/20/11
Posts: 987
Loc: Boulder Creek, CA
Our club has a new plane that I got to fly yesterday evening. Its an 1978 172N with a 180HP engine in it. That plane can REALLY climb and cruise! especially compared with the other 172s I fly at the club. It even out climbed the SP I'm used to flying. It was very nose heavy during landing compared to what I am used to, but it was a blast to fly.

A little side question. I noticed this 172N has 30 degrees of flaps. I'm used to 40 degrees of flaps on 172Ns. Are there different flap options for different model years of 172Ns? Just curious.
"I fly because I wouldn't want to do anything else." ~ A. Cluff
Musing and misadventures -

#88188 - 08/07/12 06:07 PM Re: 172N with 180HP conversion = FUN [Re: Awkward Bird]
Pilawt Online   content
Club Sponsor
Gold Pilot

Registered: 02/13/10
Posts: 1353
Loc: Vancouver, WA
All 172Ns came from the factory with 40 degrees of flap.

If the 180 hp conversion on the one you flew was done with the Air Plains STC, there are actually two different STCs for the 172N.

The first is the conversion to the 180-hp O-360 engine. That STC alone makes no changes to the airframe aft of the firewall, and does not change the gross weight from the original 2300 pounds. Thus the useful load is reduced by the added weight of the engine.

A second STC provides for installation of a physical limitation in the flap mechanism (photo below) to prevent extension greater than thirty degrees. When that is done, gross weight of the 180 hp 172N is increased by 250 lb, to 2550 lb. Reason being, the airplane would not be able to meet FAA climb guidelines for balked landing with full 40 degrees of flap at the heavier weight.

My '78 172N happens to be one of the very few with the 180 hp engine and 40 degrees of flap. It was my dad's airplane before he passed away, and when he did the 180 hp conversion in 1997 he bought both of the STCs but never had the flap limit installed. So it still has the 2300 lb gross weight. That doesn't bother me much, because I like flying into short fields, and I have no friends. grin

I have the parts for the flap limit, and can have it done any time. But for now I like it the way it is.

The 1981-86 Model 172P, the 172Q, 172RG, and all "restart-era" 172s are limited to 30 degrees of flap from the factory, as well. The flap limit in the 172P allowed the gross weight to be increased to 2400 lb without an increase in power.
Jeff Jacobs
KVUO / Vancouver, WA

#88189 - 08/07/12 06:14 PM Re: 172N with 180HP conversion = FUN [Re: Pilawt]
Awkward Bird Online   content
Silver Pilot

Registered: 11/20/11
Posts: 987
Loc: Boulder Creek, CA
Thanks for the quick info Pilawt! I had a feeling someone here would know smile
"I fly because I wouldn't want to do anything else." ~ A. Cluff
Musing and misadventures -

#88190 - 08/07/12 06:37 PM Re: 172N with 180HP conversion = FUN [Re: Awkward Bird]
Rusty Rudder Offline
Platinum Pilot

Registered: 02/26/10
Posts: 4857
Loc: NorthEast
Very interesting, I would have rather had the 40 degrees than the paper that says 2550 on it... (I've got the 172 w/180 Penn Yann)

Good accurate info pw, thanx!
Take-off's are optional, landings are manditory

#88196 - 08/07/12 07:30 PM Re: 172N with 180HP conversion = FUN [Re: Rusty Rudder]
Nintendo Pilot Online   happy
Gold Pilot

Registered: 05/22/11
Posts: 1582
Loc: Utah
That 180 HP engine is nice isn't it AB?
1979 Cessna 172N (N9478E) w/180 hp conversion by Air Plains
Alan C.

Youtube Channel

#88255 - 08/08/12 01:55 AM Re: 172N with 180HP conversion = FUN [Re: Nintendo Pilot]
Nightowl Offline
Club Sponsor/Speed Demon
Gold Pilot

Registered: 02/14/10
Posts: 1826
Loc: Northwest lower Michigan
Our 172N has the 180 hp AirPlains conversion with the STC to increase max gross weight to 2550 lbs (restricting max flap extension to 30 degrees and beefing up tires to six-ply). It really does climb like a homesick angel, and we have flown often with four adults on board, so am very happy with the gross weight increase. I usually land with 20 degrees of flap or less and rarely use 30, so 40 would be overkill for our usual needs (our three previous Cessnas all had the 40 degree flaps, so definitely have used them in the past).

Another advantage is that our STC includes a change to the flap extension speed, allowing 10 degrees of flap at 110 kts, with any further flap deployment kept to 85 kts or less (just as the 172Q POH specifies). Dropping 10 degrees at 110 kts gets us down to 85 kts quite nicely, so this has proven to be very beneficial, especially on instrument approaches.

And yes, I've flown the 172P, R, and SP, and our airplane, being lighter, does outclimb them all. And it also can carry more passenger payload than our CAP 182T when fueled for a similar mission.

The 180 hp engine is what should have been in the 172 all along.

'77 C172N, AirPlains 180 hp conversion

Our sigmap has been flown entirely using aircraft with capabilities at or below those of the C-172.

#88303 - 08/08/12 01:25 PM Re: 172N with 180HP conversion = FUN [Re: Nightowl]
Pilawt Online   content
Club Sponsor
Gold Pilot

Registered: 02/13/10
Posts: 1353
Loc: Vancouver, WA
One important benefit to the more powerful engine is that it allows one to maintain a higher airspeed while climbing, helping the engine to stay cool during a long climb on a hot day.
Jeff Jacobs
KVUO / Vancouver, WA


Moderator:  Ward Holbrook 
Cessna172 Tribute
Special thanks to:
Thank you for making this site great
Strother '14 Countdown
June 12-15, 2014 KWLD
Today's Birthdays
Asti, linkbelt
Member Map
Where in the world are the Cessna 172 Club Members?

View the map

Helpful Links
100LL Price Finder
AD Directory
Aging GA Aircraft
Aircraft Directory
Airplane Report
Airport Facilities Directory
Aviation Weather
C172 History
Crash Records
DUAT Voyager Planner
Flight Aware
Fly-In Calendar
Flying Tools (Files)
Google Earth
Ground Speed Records
National METAR Map
Sky Vector
Uvalde Flight Ctr
All the Webcams
Shout Box

Weather Lookup
Airport code:
(separate multiple codes with spaces)

List of stations